xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] speculative preallocation quota throttling

To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] speculative preallocation quota throttling
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 12:50:15 +1100
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5127D060.5050806@xxxxxxx>
References: <1361373019-30891-1-git-send-email-bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> <5127D060.5050806@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:09:04PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> 
>       -- since I am being a grouch ... ---
> I wish I had caught in the review for commit a1e16c26 that
> xfs_iomap_eof_prealloc_initial_size() is returning an int rather
> than xfs_fsblock_t for consistency.

Which is a bug, not an inconsistency. It means that alloc_blocks may
not return the right thing at the 2^31/2^32 FSB boundary.

Don't grouch like you can't possibly fix it, just send a patch. :P
The code isn't upstream yet, so we've got the entire 3.9-rc cycle to
fix it... :)

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>