[Top] [All Lists]

Re: inode64 superblock flag is still worth

To: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: inode64 superblock flag is still worth
From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:37:07 -0300
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130222161713.GV22182@xxxxxxx>
References: <20130222132721.GA10079@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130222161713.GV22182@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Right, I'll take a look on how to implement it,

thanks Ben

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:17:13AM -0600, Ben Myers wrote
> Hi Carlos,
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:27:21AM -0300, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > I was looking the "Ideas for XFS" wiki page, and noticed a topic about the
> > implementation of a flag in superblock to identify the filesystem is using
> > 64-bit inodes. Once we use it by default now, is this idea still worth? I 
> > can
> > work on it, but I don't think this is still worth to be implemented.
> > If still looks worth, I'd suggest a flag set when 32-bit inodes only is 
> > used not
> > 64, but I really dunno how this might be useful for kernel. From a user
> > perspective, it might help, but `mount` command or mtab already shows 
> > inode32
> > option when it's used.
> So the inode32 allocation policy becomes persistent and no longer need to be
> set at mount time.  This is definately worth working on, IMO.
> Setting a bit in the superblock would work fine for inode32.  We should think
> about something more general before making on-disk changes for this.  For
> example, Rich recently posted the agskip data allocation policy which (like
> inode32) was implemented as a mount option.  If agskip=5 were to be made
> persistent we'd need space in the superblock to keep track of the 5.
> I think an xattr on the root inode could be a good solution as long as it is
> invisible to the user.  The interface for changing alloc policies should
> probably be in xfs_io or xfs_mkfs.
> -Ben
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>