xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 01/11] xfstests: add fio requirement V2

To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] xfstests: add fio requirement V2
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:19:21 +1100
Cc: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1361273843-16094-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1361273843-16094-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 03:37:13PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> FIO is very flexible io generator, I would call it IO swiss knife.
> Currently we have tonns of hardcoded application which reproduces
> some predefined scenario. This approach has obvious dissadvantages
> 1) Lack of flexability: one written it is hard to modify it in future
> 2) Code base is large, many routines written again and again
> 
> At the same time add new fio based tast is just add simle INI file.
> This greatly simplify code review. I do beleve that some day we will
> replace most of hardcoded io binaries with fio.
> 
> One who is planning to run $FIO_PROG should first check that system
> contains appropriate version which is able to handle jobfile
> for example:  _require_fio 286-job.fio
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Dimitry,

Can you rebase this series on top of a current xfstests tree? It
doesn't apply without conflicts or trying to land on top of existing
files, so that makes it hard to actually test and do a final review
on....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>