xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] fix spinlock recursion on xa_lock in xfs_buf_item_pus

To: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] fix spinlock recursion on xa_lock in xfs_buf_item_push
From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:32:05 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1360595302-15865-1-git-send-email-bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1360595302-15865-1-git-send-email-bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:08:20AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Here is v4 of the spinlock recursion fix. The only update is to the comment in
> patch 1. These changes have been run through the reproducer over the weekend
> without a failure.
> 
> I've also run another xfstests run while including the following patch from 
> Dave:
> 
> xfs: xfs_bmap_add_attrfork_local is too generic
> 
> ... due to seeing the same issue Lukas reproduced in test 013 (I saw it in 
> 070 as
> well). That problem no longer occurs with this patch included, but I have hit
> an error in test 178 that didn't fire in my baseline run. It persists if I 
> revert
> back to TOT, so I'm posting this set as is and I'll see if I can trace where 
> that
> one came from...

Applied these two.

Regards,
        Ben

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>