| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_mkfs: wipe old signatures from the device |
| From: | Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:08:37 -0700 |
| Cc: | Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Zach Brown <zabrown@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <511D1DF5.2060802@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1360667215-14701-1-git-send-email-lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130212202753.GC26694@dastard> <20130213080154.GC18597@xxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1302131127070.2315@(none)> <20130213121655.GA7799@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20130213221720.GH26694@dastard> <982B8DBB-3FBA-4213-BC92-848A64C60110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1302140929570.2315@(none)> <511D1DF5.2060802@xxxxxxxxxx> |
On Feb 14, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I was thinking, as annoying as it might be, requiring the user to > use "-f $OLD_FS_TYPE" might require a bit more positive action > and cognition on the admin's part. > > OTOH, that could get annoying, and break old scripts. :) Yes, it's possible to get carried away with this: An "are you sure" prompt that requires typing "yes"; or even more deliciously irritating, only accepts as positive: "primateconfirmspreviousfilesystemdestructionwontsubsequentlyaskaboutdatarecovery" Way, way more people will copy/paste that from a list or man entry, than acquire muscle memory for -f. Chris Murphy |
| Previous by Date: | Weird performance on a FusionIO Octal (Random writes faster than Seq.), Settlemyer, Bradley W. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_mkfs: wipe old signatures from the device, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_mkfs: wipe old signatures from the device, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_mkfs: wipe old signatures from the device, Dave Howorth |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |