[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs_mkfs: wipe old signatures from the device

To: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_mkfs: wipe old signatures from the device
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:25:09 -0600
Cc: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Zach Brown <zabrown@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1302140929570.2315@(none)>
References: <1360667215-14701-1-git-send-email-lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130212202753.GC26694@dastard> <20130213080154.GC18597@xxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1302131127070.2315@(none)> <20130213121655.GA7799@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20130213221720.GH26694@dastard> <982B8DBB-3FBA-4213-BC92-848A64C60110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1302140929570.2315@(none)>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
On 2/14/13 2:36 AM, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:29:59 -0700
>> From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>,
>>     xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx, Zach Brown <zabrown@xxxxxxxxxx>,
>>     linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_mkfs: wipe old signatures from the device
>> On Feb 13, 2013, at 3:17 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> it is the responsibility of filesystem
>>> tools to behave sanely, not for the rest of the world to have to
>>> work around the dangerous behaviour of a specific filesystems'
>>> toolset.
>> I appreciate this, and in particular that mkfs.xfs doesn't nerf a file 
>> system without the use of -f; even an existing XFS file system. Considering 
>> most data loss is user induced, I'd appreciate it if other file systems's 
>> tools weren't so easily made belligerent by (hopefully temporarily) confused 
>> apes wearing pants.
>> Chris Murphy
> I would not be so optimistic about it. The reason being that there
> are almost _always_ old file system signatures on the device. So I
> think that it got to the point where users will usually use mkfs.xfs
> -f all the time. 

I know I do ;)  But as Dave points out, fs developers are odd ducks.

> And even if they did not and they would use a wrong
> device they would probably get the same warning even for the device
> they wanted to use in the first place.

I was thinking, as annoying as it might be, requiring the user to
use "-f $OLD_FS_TYPE" might require a bit more positive action
and cognition on the admin's part.

OTOH, that could get annoying, and break old scripts.  :)


> So even thoug it might help in some cases I do not think that we
> should go and change all file systems to do that as well, it would
> not be very useful anyway.
> -Lukas

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>