xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/4 v2] Fix possible use after free with AIO

To: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v2] Fix possible use after free with AIO
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:10:17 +0800
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130130144535.GK4503@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1359502081-20240-1-git-send-email-jack@xxxxxxx> <20130130144535.GK4503@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
On 2013/1/30 22:45, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:27:57AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>>
>>   Hi,
>>
>>   since nobody seem to have picked up any of the patches (at least
>> nobody told me so), I've added acks I received to the patches and I'm
>> sending them to Al for merging. Al, can you please merge these? Thanks.
> 
> VFS part (4/4) picked; IMO at least ext* and xfs should go through the
> filesystem trees.  If ocfs2 folks don't pick fs/ocfs2 part, I'll grab
> it as well - not sure how active their tree is these days...

I would say just grab it.

We've been sending bug fixes to ocfs2 mailing list since Aug 2012, but none
was pushed into upstream.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>