xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Volume fine on x86_64, corruption on ARM

To: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Volume fine on x86_64, corruption on ARM
From: Lluís Batlle i Rossell <viric@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:37:59 +0100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <51065721.40102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20130127225258.GA2287@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <51065721.40102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:46:57AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/27/2013 4:52 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> 
> > ----------------------
> > starting systemd...
> > systemd 197 running in system mode. (+PAM -LIBWRAP -AUDIT -SELINUX +IMA 
> > +SYSVINIT -LIBCRYPTSETUP +GCRYPT +ACL +XZ)
> > 
> > Welcome to NixOS 0.2pre-4eb2b09-af495e0!
> > 
> > Failed to insert module 'autofs4'
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > dea96000: 58 46 53 42 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 01 bd 26 f0  XFSB..........&.
> > XFS (sda1): Internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2192 of file 
> > fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c.  Caller 0xbf057e68
> ...
> Your HDD is USB.  Might the failure of this module to load have
> something to do with the XFS problems?

I don't think it is related; the failure to load the module is because the
module isn't there in my kernel. And that happens after the fs has been quite
used in the boot, it's not mount time.

> Forgive me if my lack of experience with this is causing me to ask a
> stupid question.  I've never used, nor will I ever use, XFS with a USB
> drive.

Well, I didn't expect it to be any trouble :) I've XFS in other USB drives, but
before this, I only used them in x86_64. I might stop using XFS there.

Thank you,
Lluís.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>