[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: stop using simple_strtoul()

To: Abhijit Pawar <abhi.c.pawar@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: stop using simple_strtoul()
From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:33:03 -0600
Cc: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <50EC37FE.4010009@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <50E8F470.5020305@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130107204957.GT27055@xxxxxxx> <50EBC8E5.9080200@xxxxxxxxxx> <50EC37FE.4010009@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Hey Abhijit,

On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 08:45:10PM +0530, Abhijit Pawar wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 12:51 PM, Jeff Liu wrote:
> > On 01/08/2013 04:49 AM, Ben Myers wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 11:50:08AM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> >>> This small patch convert xfs_parseargs() and suffix_strtoul() to
> >>> use kstrtoint() instead of simple_strtoul() which is deprecated.
> >>
> >> It looks like Jeff's patch will conflict with a patch from Abhijit Pawar, 
> >> 'fs:
> >> remove obsolete simple_strto<foo>' which we saw Dec 7.  You guys went 
> >> after the
> >> same thing and came up with slightly differing results.  If Abhijit would
> >> prefer to factor out the xfs changes I'd be happy to take either that, or
> >> Jeff's patch, but it would be better if they didn't conflict.  Can y'all 
> >> come
> >> to an agreement as to what the xfs changes should be?
> >
> > Sorry, I missed that patch from Abhijit.
> > 
> > Looks the previous patch did not replaced the simple_strtoul() with
> > kstrtoint() in suffix_strtoul().
> > 
> > Abhijit, would you like to fix it as well?
> Yes,it did not replace the call. Looks like I have missed that piece of
> code. Once Ben applies my original patch, I will send another patch for
> this on top of that.

        I believe that your original patch contains changes for other
filesystems too.  I'd prefer to pull only xfs changes into the xfs branch.  Are
you willing to factor out the xfs changes, add the suffix_strtoul, and resend?
That way we can get it done in one go.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>