[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs bug?

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs bug?
From: Linos <info@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:44:05 +0100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130107233403.GW3120@dastard>
References: <50EB020D.9050006@xxxxxxxx> <20130107223054.GT3120@dastard> <50EB4F6E.9010700@xxxxxxxx> <20130107233403.GW3120@dastard>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
On 08/01/13 00:34, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:42:54PM +0100, Linos wrote:
>> On 07/01/13 23:30, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>> But, quite frankly - you've got a tainted kernel:
>>>     vboxpci(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxdrv(O) nvidia(PO)
>>> and you are using an out of tree scheduler patch (bfs). Hence I
>>> don't think anyone is going to waste time trying to track this down
>>> as it stands.  If you can reproduce it on an untainted, unpatched
>>> kernel then you'll have somethign we might be able to debug....
>> I can try with an unpatched kernel without VirtualBox modules but i need 
>> nvidia
>> propietary module in this computer to use my multi-monitor setup, would 
>> suffice
>> that?
> That would at least rule out 2 of the 3 potential problems. Note
> that if you do get another workqueue oops like this one you probably
> should report it to lkml rather than here....
> Cheers,
> Dave.

ok, i will try and report the problem to lkml if needed, thanks!

Miguel Angel.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>