[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs bug?

To: Linos <info@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs bug?
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:34:03 +1100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <50EB4F6E.9010700@xxxxxxxx>
References: <50EB020D.9050006@xxxxxxxx> <20130107223054.GT3120@dastard> <50EB4F6E.9010700@xxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:42:54PM +0100, Linos wrote:
> On 07/01/13 23:30, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > But, quite frankly - you've got a tainted kernel:
> > 
> >     vboxpci(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxdrv(O) nvidia(PO)
> > 
> > and you are using an out of tree scheduler patch (bfs). Hence I
> > don't think anyone is going to waste time trying to track this down
> > as it stands.  If you can reproduce it on an untainted, unpatched
> > kernel then you'll have somethign we might be able to debug....
> I can try with an unpatched kernel without VirtualBox modules but i need 
> nvidia
> propietary module in this computer to use my multi-monitor setup, would 
> suffice
> that?

That would at least rule out 2 of the 3 potential problems. Note
that if you do get another workqueue oops like this one you probably
should report it to lkml rather than here....


Dave Chinner

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>