| To: | "Bradley C. Kuszmaul" <kuszmaul@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: block alignment |
| From: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:42:00 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <CAKSyJXdP0NSQrR+rfrCec+oCyVg-2SRmCmYf3V7kjC1-0x49bA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CAKSyJXdP0NSQrR+rfrCec+oCyVg-2SRmCmYf3V7kjC1-0x49bA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Hey Bradley,
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 04:33:18PM -0500, Bradley C. Kuszmaul wrote:
> What is the largest data block size that I'm likely to run into with xfs?
4k blocks is what to expect unless you are using larger pages.
>From mkfs.xfs manpage:
" -b block_size_options
This option specifies the fundamental block size of the filesys‐
tem. The valid block_size_options are: log=value or size=value
and only one can be supplied. The block size is specified
either as a base two logarithm value with log=, or in bytes with
size=. The default value is 4096 bytes (4 KiB), the minimum is
512, and the maximum is 65536 (64 KiB). XFS on Linux currently
only supports pagesize or smaller blocks."
Regards,
Ben
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS restore don't restore, Ben Myers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: block alignment, Ric Wheeler |
| Previous by Thread: | block alignment, Bradley C. Kuszmaul |
| Next by Thread: | Re: block alignment, Ric Wheeler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |