| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | block alignment |
| From: | "Bradley C. Kuszmaul" <kuszmaul@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:33:18 -0500 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=DlfLF/2Kxv2mxJlUJTZlu1SWktSCEXQNRXYK95u8Vao=; b=MW62FJdXgdcGLU6z+jxeq0sgpBkdbOD8bYzSEYLBQ8DsKrpo1aYI05jMkJCYOOX/p0 LCKyhj8WprRGEqG32MCptoD+doCTQem+XWxVuBGKLNLxxf8PLmd+2i0PK9X3D36papch CTnaoyRCzCvkKIFrg3pCWX4iD5SjjDc24lPPGViIOVB2b43PFf6J4rxxze0Z5aHbH1v7 oCmwFrDcqx6mleiNJ9mJkOnt5BxDWSCTWpKKloq/5RxIkYNZ3FAjlXZIcSEBrKrzlLoi 3BTbrisqjoYLVW4r5Ou1EFoA008tY8vjViMBV6HnzDs0nNVxiZBdNKLqcsmvG1NUUz+l I80g== |
|
What is the largest data block size that I'm likely to run into with xfs? I ask, since I'm doing hole punching, and I don't want to incur the I/O required to zero unaligned boundaries. So I want to keep the holes I punch sufficiently well aligned.
-Bradley |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS restore don't restore, Stan Hoeppner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS restore don't restore, Ben Myers |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS restore don't restore, Fugazzi99 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: block alignment, Ben Myers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |