[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Open for contribution towards xfstests for btrfs

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Open for contribution towards xfstests for btrfs
From: Kiran Patil <kirantpatil@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 22:39:20 +0530
Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+QRK7wn0BDJ2LPQd+utuZO6p9jF5cWSYQPb0ZYRtvzI=; b=mM7xZ5hECb0gZO17bdTHVPigEaSUkEEzOHAkK0LXJj4+M8Y9RqUiEaKsQBLAp4KiEj 7Fk4UZnoruz3DEluLL8aWDRXdqwSwG1PbQ4J0SLjBnu7YXFy9y5V1oDEQFVwVc1JgeJK sJFf9g0dKC0JdhU2nN5jNfX/ECh42B++9RWp2aFZhrfO2jcw7rbZfnJTYfDlpuyMQ5hG q3hwLRHCIypJhX5AVPJYpCzMzuqQDFAKM9pvwKMqzwXqR1fweVDBlM+xdFS7+L+SsZon mHfFzIWYmCCmDHpC/uwlw5RrBoYLi5DhFMRiSY3KoYUe2FiTfkLL4Bs6o/BiBGRIONuh iQcg==
In-reply-to: <CANT588t+jcOZNv4w1azXkuywEbSh_+F_AtrUo=3=1P4j+Aesjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CANT588vv8xYNWGBSZUDu0vui2ZH4QqL7tvQX8zOGof7nucC6_Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CANT588tZd8y3G0jZD3Ti-nHexk1jwmD-fJP1f1bttFP8kyEgqg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <50EAF092.20907@xxxxxxxxxx> <CANT588t+jcOZNv4w1azXkuywEbSh_+F_AtrUo=3=1P4j+Aesjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Kiran Patil <kirantpatil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 1/7/13 4:18 AM, Kiran Patil wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> We have a team of 5 students who would like to contribute to btrfs
>>> filesystem testing using xfstests.
>>> Is there space for them to contribute?
>>> If yes, to whom do they need to keep in touch for guidance.
>> (cc: xfs list)
>> Are you thinking of writing new tests, or doing more formal testing
>> with the existing testsuite?  Both would be useful.
>> In particular, any time there's a bugfix, a regression test is helpful.
>> Generic new tests of btrfs functionality would be good, too.
>> I would suggest starting with a couple new tests, and cc: the xfs list
>> for review.  In the course of the review you'll get a sense of the various
>> conventions used in xfstests, etc.
>> Simply running xfstests over various btrfs configurations would also
>> be useful, to be sure any regressions caught by existing tests don't go
>> unnoticed.
>> thanks,
>> -Eric
> Dear Eric and David,
> Thanks a lot for your inputs.
> We will work on them and soon we will start our work.
> Thank you,
> -Kiran

Sorry, I forgot to say thanks to Liu and Arne.

Thank you Liu and Arne for your suggestions.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>