[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [3.0-stable PATCH 00/36] Proposed 3.0-stable bug patches

To: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [3.0-stable PATCH 00/36] Proposed 3.0-stable bug patches
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:35:17 +1100
Cc: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20121211182000.GB29421@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20121203144208.143464631@xxxxxxx> <20121211182000.GB29421@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:20:00AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 05:42:08PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> > Here a collection of bug fixes for 3.0-stable. Many of these patches
> > were also selected by Dave Chinner as possible 3.0-stable patches:
> >     http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-08/msg00255.html
> > 
> > I chose only bug fixes and kept the changes to a minimum.
> > 
> > Patch 21/22 are required for the bug fix in patch 23 but they are
> > important changes in their own right.
> So, XFS maintainers, should I queue these up for the next 3.0-stable
> release or not?

Hi Greg, it needs review first. Previously backports like this
haven't been sent to -stable until reviews have already been


Dave Chinner

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>