| To: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [3.0-stable PATCH 00/36] Proposed 3.0-stable bug patches |
| From: | Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 8 Dec 2012 11:12:12 -0800 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20121207211536.GW27055@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20121203144208.143464631@xxxxxxx> <20121205214505.GG29399@dastard> <50C0D57A.9000704@xxxxxxx> <20121207100646.GJ27172@dastard> <20121207211536.GW27055@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:15:36PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > Stable folk (cc'd Greg), what is your disposition with regard to proposing > patches for -stable proactively? Do we really need to have a bug report from > a > 3.0-stable user for every bug we propose for 3.0-stable? My rules are if the subsystem maintainer(s) agree that the patches should be applied, and they meet the stable tree guidelines, then I accept them. So it's up to you all, I'll do whatever you suggest here. thanks, greg k-h |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Ensure cmdline geometry puts mkfs.xfs into multidisk mode, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] xfsprogs: document fpunch command in xfs_io, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [3.0-stable PATCH 00/36] Proposed 3.0-stable bug patches, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [3.0-stable PATCH 00/36] Proposed 3.0-stable bug patches, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |