xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [3.0-stable PATCH 00/36] Proposed 3.0-stable bug patches

To: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [3.0-stable PATCH 00/36] Proposed 3.0-stable bug patches
From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 11:12:12 -0800
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20121207211536.GW27055@xxxxxxx>
References: <20121203144208.143464631@xxxxxxx> <20121205214505.GG29399@dastard> <50C0D57A.9000704@xxxxxxx> <20121207100646.GJ27172@dastard> <20121207211536.GW27055@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:15:36PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> Stable folk (cc'd Greg), what is your disposition with regard to proposing
> patches for -stable proactively?  Do we really need to have a bug report from 
> a
> 3.0-stable user for every bug we propose for 3.0-stable?

My rules are if the subsystem maintainer(s) agree that the patches
should be applied, and they meet the stable tree guidelines, then I
accept them.  So it's up to you all, I'll do whatever you suggest here.

thanks,

greg k-h

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>