| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] xfs: use b_maps[] for discontiguous buffers |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:09:38 -0500 |
| Cc: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20121130222110.GB12955@dastard> |
| References: | <20121128222309.109033307@.sgi.com> <20121128222622.688093599@xxxxxxx> <20121130160920.GA9873@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <50B8F2FC.6060501@xxxxxxx> <20121130222110.GB12955@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 09:21:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > eeek. yep, I will loop through and count the pages needed in each > > segment. > > That's wrong - the pages must be mappable as a contiguous memory > range. That's how this code avoids copying the data from > discontiguous page ranges into a contiguous mapped memory range. > If you separate each IO into to it's own set of pages, then you have > to completely rewrite _xfs_buf_ioapply(), which AFAICT works just > fine with the page allocation that is done right now.... Yeah, you're right. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fsck scratch device if it got used, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] xfs: fix the multi-segment log buffer format, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] xfs: use b_maps[] for discontiguous buffers, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] xfs: use b_maps[] for discontiguous buffers, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |