| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC, PATCH 00/19] Numa aware LRU lists and shrinkers |
| From: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:02:24 -0800 |
| Cc: | glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1354058086-27937-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Dave Chinner's message of "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:14:27 +1100") |
| References: | <1354058086-27937-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Comments, thoughts and flames all welcome. Doing the reclaim per CPU sounds like a big change in the VM balance. Doesn't this invalidate some zone reclaim mode settings? How did you validate all this? -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfstests: fsck scratch device if it got used, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: fix sparse reported log CRC endian issue, Ben Myers |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 18/19] shrinker: convert remaining shrinkers to count/scan API, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC, PATCH 00/19] Numa aware LRU lists and shrinkers, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |