Re: Problems with kernel 3.6.x (vm ?) (was : Is kernel 3.6.1 or filestre

xfs

[Top] [All Lists]

<prev [Date] next>

<prev [Thread] next>

Re: Problems with kernel 3.6.x (vm ?) (was : Is kernel 3.6.1 or filestre

from [reste donewell]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: Problems with kernel 3.6.x (vm ?) (was : Is kernel 3.6.1 or filestreams option toxic ?)
From:	reste donewell <rest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:39:38 +0100
Reply-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,

The proposed patch, wich works, still hasn't landed in Kernel version 3.6.6.
I think it should go to stable release.
Anybody working on this ?

Thanks in advance,

Eric Thiele

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Problems with kernel 3.6.x (vm ?) (was : Is kernel 3.6.1 or filestreams option toxic ?), reste donewell <= Re: Problems with kernel 3.6.x (vm ?) (was : Is kernel 3.6.1 or filestreams option toxic ?), Dave Chinner

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH 17/19] drivers: convert shrinkers to new count/scan API, Glauber Costa
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: fix direct IO nested transaction deadlock., Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Print when ENOSPC due to lack of inodes., Eric Sandeen
Next by Thread:	Re: Problems with kernel 3.6.x (vm ?) (was : Is kernel 3.6.1 or filestreams option toxic ?), Dave Chinner
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]