xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: inode allocation should use unmapped buffers.

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: inode allocation should use unmapped buffers.
From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:12:53 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1353641065-14983-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1353641065-14983-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1353641065-14983-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Hi Dave,

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 02:24:23PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Inode buffers do not need to be mapped as inodes are read or written
> directly from/to the pages underlying the buffer. This fixes a
> regression introduced by commit 611c994 ("xfs: make XBF_MAPPED the
> default behaviour").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

committed to git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git, master and for-next.

What's with the multiple Signed-off-by?  Is your cousin Dave getting involved
in XFS development too?  Welcome!  ;)

Thanks,
        Ben

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>