xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/9] vfs: Handle O_SYNC AIO DIO in generic code properly

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] vfs: Handle O_SYNC AIO DIO in generic code properly
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:38:55 -0500
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, bpm@xxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20121121182901.GA4519@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:29:01 -0500")
References: <20121120074116.24645.36369.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20121120074123.24645.41965.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20121121100809.GE23339@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <x497gpevqoy.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20121121182901.GA4519@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:58:05AM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> > I'd like to use this as a vehicle to revisit how dio completions work.
>> 
>> I don't like the sound of that.  ;-)  It sounds like this bugfix may get
>> further delayed by the desire for unrelated code cleanup.
>
> I've got a prototype that isn't much more invasive than the current
> series.  I'll finish it up and run it through QA and will post it
> tomorrow.

Works for me.  Thanks!

-Jeff

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>