| To: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 2/2 V2] xfstests: xfs_tosspages() test addition |
| From: | Andrew Dahl <adahl@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:35:26 -0600 |
| Cc: | <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <50A3DC58.4080704@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20121108222315.505370321@xxxxxxx> <20121108222315.709683665@xxxxxxx> <20121108232726.GV6434@dastard> <50A19EC0.4040405@xxxxxxx> <50A3DC58.4080704@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121029 Thunderbird/16.0.2 |
On 11/14/2012 12:00 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote: > On 11/12/12 19:13, Andrew Dahl wrote: >> >> Tests the XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE ioctl by way of the "xfs_io zero" utility >> to ensure it is tossing the expected ranges. >> >> The ranges tested are [0,1] [0,4095] [0,4096] [0,4097] [4095,8191] >> [4095,8192] [4095,8193] [4096,8192] [1024,4096] >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Dahl<adahl@xxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> > > ... > > >> + >> + $XFS_IO_PROG -F -f -t -c "pwrite -S 0x41 0 4096" \ > > -F is deprecated in xfs_io. > > Looks good. > > Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> Actually... I just realized I neglected to add one change in there. The call to _require_xfs_io_zero doesn't exist, but should in common.rc I'll repost the patch with this included. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 2/2 V2] xfstests: xfs_tosspages() test addition, Mark Tinguely |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 02/32 V2] xfs: remove xfs_tosspages, Andrew Dahl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 2/2 V2] xfstests: xfs_tosspages() test addition, Mark Tinguely |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 2/2 V3] xfstests: xfs_tosspages() test addition, Andrew Dahl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |