xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/6] xfs: fixes for 3.7-rc3

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] xfs: fixes for 3.7-rc3
From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 10:34:26 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20121107205621.GH6434@dastard>
References: <1351816724-3000-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20121107205621.GH6434@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Hi Dave,

On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 07:56:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:38:38AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Here are my current outstanding fixes that are candidates for 3.7.
> > Patches 2 and 3 are the initial fixes from the verifier series (real
> > bugs) and the other are regressions that I've recently fixed. Some
> > need to be sent back to stable kernels as well and are tagged as
> > such.
> 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> What's the status with these? It's been almost a week since I posted
> them, and apart from patch 5, they are all good to go to Linus. IMO,
> patch 5 is also good to go as well, but I don't mind if that is not
> sent immediately as that one is not as critical as the others.
> 
> I'm particularly concerned because of the bug that patch 6 fixes -
> it's a real corruption bug that users are hitting we need to get it
> upstream and back into the stable kernels ASAP. But this patch
> hasn't even been committed to the dev tree yet...
> 
> Can you please get these upstream ASAP? If you don't have the time
> to do it today, let me know so I can send the patches straight to
> Linus and get them to the upstream and stable trees that way....

I pulled these in yesterday.  I'll send the pull request this afternoon.

Regards,
        Ben

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>