| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump:fill in bs_forkoff |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Nov 2012 16:15:44 +1100 |
| Cc: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <50934DAA.8070207@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5080D0BD.3000304@xxxxxxxxxx> <20121030194718.GD405@xxxxxxx> <50903075.6060600@xxxxxxxxxx> <20121031194654.GB9783@xxxxxxx> <50934DAA.8070207@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:35:54PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 10/31/12 2:46 PM, Ben Myers wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > ... > > > It seemed like it could be an important bugfix but I wasn't really sure so I > > asked. Since it sounds like it's not a big deal, lets just hold off till > > after > > the release... > > Well, I was wrong - at least at one point, I thought it was getting zeroed. > (?!) > > But Dave was running into trouble tonight ... > > And as the git tree stands today, I'm getting checksum errors w/o this patch > too, and xfstests dump group is passing only with it added back in. > > So I think you'd better pull it in, maybe change the commit message a bit > though - it downplays the importance too much I guess. Yes, this patch fixes the failures I see under normal conditions. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump:fill in bs_forkoff, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: status of userspace release, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump:fill in bs_forkoff, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump:fill in bs_forkoff, Ben Myers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |