| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 16/25] xfs: factor out dir2 data block reading |
| From: | Phil White <pwhite@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:21:37 -0700 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1351146854-19343-17-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1351146854-19343-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1351146854-19343-17-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 05:34:05PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > And add a verifier callback function while there. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_block.c | 3 +-- > fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_data.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++--------------------- > fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_node.c | 8 ++++---- > fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_priv.h | 2 ++ > 5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) This one actually made a little light bulb go off. I'd been wondering why you conjoined logical conditions in an assignment to block_ok earlier, but split things out here. I see now that it's to explicitly and unambiguosly separate out the order of evaluation. Reviewed-by: Phil White <pwhite@xxxxxxx> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 15/25] xfs: factor dir2 free block reading, Phil White |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 14/25] xfs: verify dir2 block format buffers, Phil White |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 16/25] xfs: factor out dir2 data block reading, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 08/25] xfs: verify AGFL blocks as they are read from disk, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |