xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Problems with kernel 3.6.x (vm ?) (was : Is kernel 3.6.1 or filestre

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Problems with kernel 3.6.x (vm ?) (was : Is kernel 3.6.1 or filestreams option toxic ?)
From: Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:17:13 +0100
In-reply-to: <508E3940.4080200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <508554AF.5050005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <50865453.5080708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <508958FF.4000007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20121025211047.GD29378@dastard> <508A600C.1020109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <508B092E.6070209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20121028234802.GE4353@dastard> <508E3940.4080200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121017 Thunderbird/16.0.1
Le 29/10/2012 09:07, Yann Dupont a écrit :

Hello dave. That is THE question. My intent was to test with and without LVM. But right now I can't , because all my disks are consumed by lvm. In fact my test setup hasn't even enough space to locally clone the volume where I have errors. I only have 146 sas disks on this machine.
whoooops
read 146 GB sas disks

If I really had 146 sas disks on that machine I shouldn't have disk space problems :)
Cheers,

--
Yann Dupont - Service IRTS, DSI Université de Nantes
Tel : 02.53.48.49.20 - Mail/Jabber : Yann.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>