| To: | Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] speculative preallocation inode tracking |
| From: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:31:08 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5084368F.3000204@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1349446636-8611-1-git-send-email-bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> <5081BFFF.70603@xxxxxxx> <50840003.406@xxxxxxxxxx> <5084368F.3000204@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0 |
On 10/21/12 12:53, Mark Tinguely wrote: Not at all a big deal, (16 used and 12 padding = ) 28 bytes was an odd number and it got my curiosity up. I suspected it was part a plan of yours and Pinky to take over the world. :) Ha-ha. never-mind. I am foiled again by my inability to count past 4, or stupidity of counting using diff files. --Mark. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] speculative preallocation inode tracking, Mark Tinguely |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] speculative preallocation inode tracking, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] speculative preallocation inode tracking, Mark Tinguely |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] speculative preallocation inode tracking, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |