| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Why xfs_<utils> not 'readline' w/line-edit & history enabled? |
| From: | David Disseldorp <ddiss@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:12:54 +0200 |
| Cc: | Linda Walsh <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <11246457.6091377.1349236739598.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <506BB645.1000500@xxxxxxxxx> <11246457.6091377.1349236739598.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 23:58:59 -0400 (EDT) Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > Yeah yeah.. rub it in... > > At one point suse USED to be good -- they were one of the few that > > used / supported XFS... > > > > Mmm, wasn't trying to pass judgement there - I'm sure the OpenSuSE > package maintainer will take a patch to enable it in the spec file > there if its not in place. Thanks Nathan. A bug has been raised to track this: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783510 Cheers, David |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v3] xfstests: Use upstream version of fstrim instead of the local one, Lukáš Czerner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: sparse files, Brian Foster |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why xfs_<utils> not 'readline' w/line-edit & history enabled?, Linda Walsh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why xfs_<utils> not 'readline' w/line-edit & history enabled?, Linda Walsh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |