xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix a compile warning at seek_sanity_test.c

To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix a compile warning at seek_sanity_test.c
From: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:17:02 +0800
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5059D292.1080500@xxxxxxx>
Organization: Oracle
References: <4FCA2422.90804@xxxxxxxxxx> <5059CA6B.8090609@xxxxxxx> <5059D0D5.9050205@xxxxxxxxxx> <5059D292.1080500@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/3.1.20
On 09/19/2012 10:11 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:

> On 09/19/12 09:04, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> On 09/19/2012 09:36 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/02/12 09:33, Jeff Liu wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Compiler report warning at seek_sanity_test.c:
>>>> seek_sanity_test.c:46:3: warning: format '%lx' expects type 'long
>>>> unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int'
>>>>
>>>> Below patch can fix it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu<jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Sorry, looks like this clean-up patch has not been committed yet.
>>>
>>> Looks good.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely<tinguely@xxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>> Could you please also consider another patch for 286 improvements at:
>> http://patchwork.xfs.org/patch/3731
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Jeff
>>
> 
> Yes, I will make sure it gets committed; it has been already reviewed.
> 
> Did I remember correctly that there is plans for another test for the
> latest kernel features?

Yes, we have discussed that before, however, I thought it was your idea
so I have not work it out. :)

I'll write if you have no time to do it.

-Jeff

> 
> --Mark.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>