On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:42:01PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:28:41PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > Your impression is just a few days out of date. See:
> > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-09/msg00156.html
> On a unrelated note, has there been any thought about potentially
> setting up a separate mailing list dedicated for xfstests?
You might even be the first person to suggest that. ;)
> I'm not
> subscribed to the xfs mailing list, mainly because I was trying to
> avoid adding yet another high volume mailing list to my inbox
> (although to be fair, I guess it's only 25 messages per day even on
> the busiest days), and so I've missed out on review of Dave's changes
> to break out the tests into hierarchies, etc. I wonder if there are
> other xfstests users that aren't yet subscribed to the xfs mailing
> list who would if there was a separate mailing list.
> Not a big deal; if people really don't want a separate mailing list, I
> guess I could subscribe to the xfs list as well...
I think it's worth discussing and I'm not resistant to a separate list. But
like you said, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx isn't extremely high volume. Maybe a filter for
xfstests in the subject would be good enough for your purposes?