[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?

To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:15:56 -0400
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <50588898.6050802@xxxxxxx>
References: <nsxa9wojdcd.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120918064039.GS11511@dastard> <50588898.6050802@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:43:36AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> xfstest 285 and 286 (I believe these tests were only in the OSS
> version and not in the kernel.org developers version of xfstests).

Hi Mark,

Could you clarify what the relationship is between the OSS xfstests
tree and the one on kernel.org?  Is the OSS tree always ahead of the
kernel.org tree (i.e., are the commits in the OSS tree a superset of
the ones in the kernel.org tree)?

I had been under the impression that commits flowed from the
kernel.org tree to the OSS tree, but it sounds like I was misinformed
on that point?


                                                - Ted

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>