| To: | "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:40:39 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <nsxa9wojdcd.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <nsxa9wojdcd.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:04:34PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > Does anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA handy? As near as I > can tell xfstests doesn't have any tests for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA > functionality, and I was hoping someone had some test programs and test > sets already written. Perhaps a cc to xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx so the xfstests maintainers see the question would be a sensible idea? As it is, there are tests pending check-in that test seek-data/seek-hole functionality - they were used to verify the unwritten extent aware XFS implementation that recently went into the kernel.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: make inode64 as the default allocation mode, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: add xfs_set_inode32(), Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, for-next, updated. v3.6-rc1-10-g4026c9f, xfs |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?, Mark Tinguely |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |