xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: userspace trees

To: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: userspace trees
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:13:04 -0500
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20120913201029.GZ25175@xxxxxxx>
References: <20120913075026.GA27256@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5052142B.3010601@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20120913175316.GR3274@xxxxxxx> <50521DCE.7020203@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20120913201029.GZ25175@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
On 9/13/12 3:10 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hey Eric & Christoph,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:54:22PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 9/13/12 12:53 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:13:15PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> On 9/13/12 2:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>>> It seems with the kernel.org account purge last year and me being way to
>>>>> busy it seems like the -dev trees of the XFS userspace get very little
>>>>> attention.  What do people think about retiring them and using the oss
>>>>> trees exclusively again for now?  Right now the trees are getting a bit
>>>>> out of sync which isn't a good thing.
>>>>
>>>> ISTR it was done in response to a .... fear of SGI being less responsive 
>>>> after
>>>> a different type of account purge.  ;)  
>>>>
>>>> If SGI wants to be responsible for merging all userspace patches as they
>>>> come in on the list, I'm fine with going back to one tree on oss.
>>>
>>> I discussed this with management.  SGI is willing to take on the 
>>> responsibility
>>> of merging all userspace patches.
>>>
>>> I think retiring the -dev trees will resolve the out-of-sync issues we've 
>>> been
>>> having, and be less confusing for all involved.
>>
>> Sounds like a plan.  Will you make sure everything gets re-synced from 
>> kernel.org
>> so nothing is lost?
> 
> ~/dmapi$ git pull korg master
> From git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/dmapi-dev
>  * branch            master     -> FETCH_HEAD
>  Already up-to-date.
> 
> ~/xfsdump$ git pull korg master
> From git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfsdump-dev
>  * branch            master     -> FETCH_HEAD
>  Already up-to-date.
> 
> ~/xfsprogs$ git pull kernel.org master
> From git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfsprogs-dev
>  * branch            master     -> FETCH_HEAD
> Updating a8decaf..7db1e7b
> Fast-forward
>  db/bmap.c       |    4 ++--
>  db/btblock.c    |   11 -----------
>  mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c |   15 +++++++++------
>  repair/bmap.c   |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  repair/dir2.c   |    6 +++++-
>  5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> I've brought xfsprogs master branch uptodate here
> git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsprogs.git
> 
> ~/xfstests # git pull korg master
> From git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev
>  * branch            master     -> FETCH_HEAD
> Auto-merging group
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in group
> Auto-merging 285.out
> CONFLICT (add/add): Merge conflict in 285.out
> Auto-merging 285
> CONFLICT (add/add): Merge conflict in 285
> Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
> 
> I've merged and brought xfstests master branch uptodate here
> git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfstests.git
> 
> Did I miss anything?  Any other branches to copy over?

I've not done anything except with the master branch.

-Eric

> Thanks,
> Ben
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>