| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: userspace trees |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:13:15 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120913075026.GA27256@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20120913075026.GA27256@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 |
On 9/13/12 2:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > It seems with the kernel.org account purge last year and me being way to > busy it seems like the -dev trees of the XFS userspace get very little > attention. What do people think about retiring them and using the oss > trees exclusively again for now? Right now the trees are getting a bit > out of sync which isn't a good thing. ISTR it was done in response to a .... fear of SGI being less responsive after a different type of account purge. ;) If SGI wants to be responsible for merging all userspace patches as they come in on the list, I'm fine with going back to one tree on oss. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs: stop the sync worker before xfs_unmountfs, Ben Myers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: userspace trees, Ben Myers |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: userspace trees, Carlos Maiolino |
| Next by Thread: | Re: userspace trees, Ben Myers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |