[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/102]: xfs: 3.0.x stable kernel update

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/102]: xfs: 3.0.x stable kernel update
From: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:23:15 +0200
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20120823215409.GU19235@dastard>
References: <1345698180-13612-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120823215409.GU19235@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On 24.08.2012 07:54, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Folks,
> Can please tell me if you did or didn't get the entire series. I
> didn't receive the entire series back in my inbox - about 20 are
> missing from my inbox.  A quick check of the archives shows that all
> 102 patches reached the server and entered the archive, so I'm
> curious to know how many people had delivery failures....

The thread (currently) occupies slots 78 to 180 in my MUA, which is 103 
of 103 if i'm counting right.

Bis denn

Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as 
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, 
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>