[Top] [All Lists]

Re: NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:11:44 -0400
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, ext4 hackers <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20120817225524.GA19235@dastard>
References: <CABRT9RAOhaxcYdCxMn5neJ9WT85r=h=7WgZ2dmLaOs-MMqDW9A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120816024654.GB3781@xxxxxxxxx> <20120816111051.GA16036@localhost> <20120816152513.GA31346@xxxxxxxxx> <20120817060110.GA28786@localhost> <20120817131558.GA11439@xxxxxxxxx> <20120817174841.GA4519@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120817203438.GA573@xxxxxxxxx> <20120817210527.GA22716@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120817225524.GA19235@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 08:55:24AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> No.  The whole point of moving to multiple directories is to allow
> easy extension for domain specific tests without having to hack up
> the check script or play other games with test naming. Duplicate
> names in different test subdirectories are most certainly allowed.

Oh, I agree, using separate directories is *way* better than the hack
we're using internally.  The main benefit of what we did was the
patches were minimally intrusive....

> > Can you take a look at Dave's series if that helps you?  I haven't
> > really reviewed it much myself yet, but I'll try to get to it ASAP.
> Well, I'd apprepciate it if somebody looked at it. It's been almost
> a month since I posted it and all I've heard is crickets so far...

I definitely want to look at it, but realistically, I probably won't
have time until after San Diego....  I've been crazy busy lately.


                                                - Ted

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>