| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Change fstrim behaviour to be consistent with upstream version |
| From: | Tomas Racek <tracek@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Jul 2012 06:24:26 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120730220413.GI2877@dastard> |
> If we have duplicate code (i.e. a copy of the upstream utility) or
> the local tool can be completely replaced by the upstream tool,
> then we should use upstream and remove the local copy completely.
> Distros have been shipping fstrim for long enough now that most
> people running testing on upstream kernels will have it installed...
>
OK, I'll create the patch which drops local version.
> Adding a _require_fstrim() function that checks for the upstream
> version of fstrim to be installed for each test that requires it
> would go along with this.
Did you mean something like
_require_fstrim()
{
which fstrim &>/dev/null || _notrun "This test requires fstrim
utility."
}
in common.rc or locally in each test?
Thanks for comments!
Tomas
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Validate your email address now.., EMSE Systems Administrator |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/1] xfs: check for possible overflow in xfs_ioc_trim, Tomas Racek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Change fstrim behaviour to be consistent with upstream version, Lukáš Czerner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Change fstrim behaviour to be consistent with upstream version, Lukáš Czerner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |