xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/5] do not take the iolock in inode reclaim context

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] do not take the iolock in inode reclaim context
From: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:30:48 -0500
Cc: <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20120704151328.928543446@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20120704151328.928543446@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
On 07/04/2012 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
This series should fix the (false-positive) lockdep warnings Sage
has seen while testing ceph workloads with heavy attr usage.

Btw, you probably should create the XFS filesystems for Ceph usage
with large inodes to avoid going out of line for the attributes.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

I really liked the way this patch series was broken up. As I am new to the XFS group, this was very educational to review. Nice job Christoph.

--Rich

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>