| To: | Jie Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v4] xfs: probe data buffer from page cache for unwritten extents |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 22 Jul 2012 02:28:30 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <500B8FAA.8030804@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <50091696.4000903@xxxxxxxxxx> <5009A786.3080500@xxxxxxx> <500A4B24.40908@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120722045703.GA17235@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <500B8FAA.8030804@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 01:29:14PM +0800, Jie Liu wrote: > Should we keep 285 unchanged and introduce a new test 28? which is > dedicated to ensuring the refinements works as expected? > I have added some new test cases to Mark's test program yesterday, > looks it will grow even bigger if I can think out some other > corner cases(will send them to Mark). I think a separate case is better, as 285 just tests a basic correct implementation, while this one tests the refinements. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v4] xfs: probe data buffer from page cache for unwritten extents, Jie Liu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | FÃLICITATIONS !!!!! VOUS VENEZ DE GAGNER 250.000,00 â (CECI N'EST PAS UN SPAM NI UN VIRUS), service courrier |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v4] xfs: probe data buffer from page cache for unwritten extents, Jie Liu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: [PATCH] Prefix IO_XX flags with XFS_IO_XX to avoid namespace colision., Rich Johnston |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |