xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worke

To: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:51:32 -0700
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, joshhunt00@xxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, rni@xxxxxxxxxx, vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx, vwadekar@xxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx, bpm@xxxxxxx, elder@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx, gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx, johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx, linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MQ4cukrP22l9uA3SmsSK7Wsti7LRBguvq2xqOHjAaR0=; b=ecqPXDlWwIyWISpLYACPy87OHPjYdYS+h9T2rMZFsOVZgH6yxBlDBQx6NybiXjTem8 dJydH0KHQIRmMtOFVYBy23dak+wG4A9KRfC+aaoS9JVZTFKoKbHM66JyHSP5i+rGNd/X nDLn/PGRUtstawwpGw4IiJWRpOeeIuYaTbSeqjjQoA4LbzULwhS3cFVkZ0O213C4Gqfl EWgimP23Rnj5wo6Fd8h8UVJS/LLEAHRxh+LYhL9RacEDsB3duN/0+Kk1JdXqOxEaYw5h RFap3hHFJLSFQX9Fp26VEQdg54NWxzH+xQa4jbrRnrV3QPCZ/OLH1zziPy0JJ2liHH2i JFAA==
In-reply-to: <CA+8MBbJbjKmH29Yapih9anxXTsNy7C2TWgtnFX3-Gm6cNyCY3g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1341859315-17759-7-git-send-email-tj@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120712130648.GA19214@localhost> <20120712170519.GA20167@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120712214514.GD20167@xxxxxxxxxx> <CA+8MBb+ghRpmtrk=t5-6MqrPMZt+a69UoAWaubyKBeptGdBrWA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120712223221.GF20167@xxxxxxxxxx> <CA+8MBbJQVF3-CUU8MPWgm7OifD-C8=U2=uPF3JH9XNvAWVAX6A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120712233645.GG20167@xxxxxxxxxx> <CA+8MBbJbjKmH29Yapih9anxXTsNy7C2TWgtnFX3-Gm6cNyCY3g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Still hasn't come back in three reboots.  I have to leave now, can continue
> tomorrow.

Tired of rebooting ... seems that it is very hard to hit this with
this patch :-(

-Tony

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>