| To: | Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool |
| From: | Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:46:12 -0700 |
| Cc: | Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, joshhunt00@xxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, rni@xxxxxxxxxx, vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx, vwadekar@xxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx, bpm@xxxxxxx, elder@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx, gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx, johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx, linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gmuBXnrwnbiv6p6DwWLZVQa90I9GaMPNuk7wQcC3hBQ=; b=Qx5XXMI/5hPqdhXbEpQfWnGy3BocXYCxMlLDR4AGHlfrRMD0p/0TDHOFAHO5l5symI BlnBSAtcqRyPBbsc78bxHixJlGSipgn77Z+Jhb7WH5qTpHfqRV01JxU3vYPgvd5MY74s MbRszVSzDyN981+apcJAyLAYhTpA98fr1uXYt2ugf4NySSj+Nn8a+WjljyqaCjMTEI8r o2k21loa4cJet0YeXwXWt5arOnP7AS513GNUqRBkdCgehXauto3OWy6jTYjE7Z3LW7S7 hMYd2JRW4tNWBhcKUCJW34f+WAS3oU4vIa2l+KvA8hAsGS2xhJKpiUjoRcc7gkUKzYNd 03Lw== |
| In-reply-to: | <20120712233645.GG20167@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1341859315-17759-7-git-send-email-tj@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120712130648.GA19214@localhost> <20120712170519.GA20167@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120712214514.GD20167@xxxxxxxxxx> <CA+8MBb+ghRpmtrk=t5-6MqrPMZt+a69UoAWaubyKBeptGdBrWA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120712223221.GF20167@xxxxxxxxxx> <CA+8MBbJQVF3-CUU8MPWgm7OifD-C8=U2=uPF3JH9XNvAWVAX6A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120712233645.GG20167@xxxxxxxxxx> |
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The debug patch didn't do anything for the bug itself. I suppose it's > timing dependent and doesn't always happen (it never reproduces here > for some reason). Can you please repeat several times and see whether > the warning can be triggered? Still hasn't come back in three reboots. I have to leave now, can continue tomorrow. -Tony |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool, Tejun Heo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool, Fengguang Wu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool, Tejun Heo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool, Tony Luck |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |