| To: | Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool |
| From: | Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:24:47 -0700 |
| Cc: | Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, joshhunt00@xxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, rni@xxxxxxxxxx, vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx, vwadekar@xxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx, bpm@xxxxxxx, elder@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx, gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx, johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx, linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4Vc3puK+9BNSHWyQfM457CLIypd6LrFjxG7YBQyxdaw=; b=vVD/H5NatSbirPXVZlB50hPFfuJY47nlQ1WrNkFZSrIJ/IOmMV+/5L2yKUBieeF9uV YrHnfJgVwP4KabnHaY8We4bIfjkBz3X0XvjAM8gC7O4VCBB4vn1XbbVcVwxa7H0eH7+h 4dgQEaBWgP1ZgGMHed5XxnFtgjoQYf9fgVc+85EsgGAH4ao5JtXfEfTa1WUn/5Snnlz7 CK1jZW2az7+U6kLrsa0p4euzKheuSLx4BP0bfjnkCoW3dvWGmqdR0+LJVmbeDAYa2EsE qKGYxWbG4xMYvDx94rqeRiJiIREhTZ56Q1gkiG80Xv/spXffr/7dk8N1U+ZBv6IYGRwz E87Q== |
| In-reply-to: | <20120712223221.GF20167@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1341859315-17759-7-git-send-email-tj@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120712130648.GA19214@localhost> <20120712170519.GA20167@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120712214514.GD20167@xxxxxxxxxx> <CA+8MBb+ghRpmtrk=t5-6MqrPMZt+a69UoAWaubyKBeptGdBrWA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120712223221.GF20167@xxxxxxxxxx> |
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Can you please try the following debug patch instead? Yours is > different from Fengguang's. New dmesg from mext-20120712 + this new patch (instead of previous one) [Note - I see some XXX traces, but no WARN_ON stack dump this time] -Tony
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: do not call xfs_bdstrat_cb in xfs_buf_iodone_callbacks, Ben Myers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool, Tejun Heo |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool, Tejun Heo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool, Tejun Heo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
