xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worke

To: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:24:47 -0700
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, joshhunt00@xxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, rni@xxxxxxxxxx, vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx, vwadekar@xxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx, bpm@xxxxxxx, elder@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx, gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx, johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx, linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4Vc3puK+9BNSHWyQfM457CLIypd6LrFjxG7YBQyxdaw=; b=vVD/H5NatSbirPXVZlB50hPFfuJY47nlQ1WrNkFZSrIJ/IOmMV+/5L2yKUBieeF9uV YrHnfJgVwP4KabnHaY8We4bIfjkBz3X0XvjAM8gC7O4VCBB4vn1XbbVcVwxa7H0eH7+h 4dgQEaBWgP1ZgGMHed5XxnFtgjoQYf9fgVc+85EsgGAH4ao5JtXfEfTa1WUn/5Snnlz7 CK1jZW2az7+U6kLrsa0p4euzKheuSLx4BP0bfjnkCoW3dvWGmqdR0+LJVmbeDAYa2EsE qKGYxWbG4xMYvDx94rqeRiJiIREhTZ56Q1gkiG80Xv/spXffr/7dk8N1U+ZBv6IYGRwz E87Q==
In-reply-to: <20120712223221.GF20167@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1341859315-17759-7-git-send-email-tj@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120712130648.GA19214@localhost> <20120712170519.GA20167@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120712214514.GD20167@xxxxxxxxxx> <CA+8MBb+ghRpmtrk=t5-6MqrPMZt+a69UoAWaubyKBeptGdBrWA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120712223221.GF20167@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Can you please try the following debug patch instead?  Yours is
> different from Fengguang's.

New dmesg from mext-20120712 + this new patch (instead of previous one)

[Note - I see some XXX traces, but no WARN_ON stack dump this time]

-Tony

Attachment: dmesg.txt
Description: Text document

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>