| To: | Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool |
| From: | Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:16:30 -0700 |
| Cc: | Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, joshhunt00@xxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, rni@xxxxxxxxxx, vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx, vwadekar@xxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx, bpm@xxxxxxx, elder@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx, gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx, johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx, linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Ukx52R4w9XgRv67rtZ/Dv3BUuebtrriBDookZzu9cQ4=; b=R6TiXHsaGMsTm6xym3FczDmhkAgdi4D5Vo7VSM+mDgoU7aiUfrcjYDL8azk92pp65N sVshwtR5KuX8hwPIDiZTxmgpgj9F+/TEzT/SdubNRn4T3bwgeL07jjQGHG5k8AKsTKp1 14RGVnKM1jPr/v94EOVl58fEKrlOGkeLQHRk9SA8f4Ytq+z6v41zZqB5zQ0YK8xOoS5M OdnqSMqWoPAqka8qO7gFNQeyhscibn8PsQwoKNyIYti4lmITeRxM9C6U3EWXV3KabLiX txmAttQx3+bpDxIsB7JtSUX7XszoAHTGdulW77EGLv+ci9Ehgqe39AS4e4g7JIKHjADG V8fw== |
| In-reply-to: | <20120712214514.GD20167@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1341859315-17759-7-git-send-email-tj@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120712130648.GA19214@localhost> <20120712170519.GA20167@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120712214514.GD20167@xxxxxxxxxx> |
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I was wrong and am now dazed and confused. That's from > init_workqueues() where only cpu0 is running. How the hell did > nr_running manage to become non-zero at that point? Can you please > apply the following patch and report the boot log? Thank you. Patch applied on top of next-20120712 (which still has the same problem). dmesg output attached -Tony
|
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH UPDATED 2/6] workqueue: factor out worker_pool from global_cwq, Tejun Heo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool, Tejun Heo |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool, Tejun Heo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool, Tejun Heo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
