xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH 0/2] xfs: regression fixes for 3.5-rc7

from [Christoph Hellwig] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] xfs: regression fixes for 3.5-rc7
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 04:24:33 -0400
Cc: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20120711235227.GA19223@dastard>
References: <1342042843-1773-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120711224822.GQ10196@xxxxxxx> <20120711235227.GA19223@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) 
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:52:27AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > IMO we should also consider "xfs: prevent recursion in xfs_buf_iorequest", 
> > from
> > Christoph.
> 
> Yes, I think so. You don't have to wait for me to propose fixes to
> suggest other patches that could be considered for Linus updates... ;)

I'm pretty sure I suggesteds these specificly for 3.5-rc.

Note that Linus is going to release 3.5 soon, so we should rush to both
get the 3.5 fixes and the remaining 3.6 queue in.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH 0/2] xfs: regression fixes for 3.5-rc7, Dave Chinner
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool, Fengguang Wu
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH 0/2] xfs: regression fixes for 3.5-rc7, Dave Chinner
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH 0/2] xfs: regression fixes for 3.5-rc7, Ben Myers
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]