[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Backporting the concurrent direct IO write fix to 3.4

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Backporting the concurrent direct IO write fix to 3.4
From: Igor M Podlesny <for.poige+xfs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 12:09:06 +0800
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Kerin Millar <kerframil@xxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=gk3uXxeXD7WwikK2o/QV4ue+J1linWIBAejZW9HL/Qs=; b=FTqVLxbOfcQfUyYPb+QbE6c/cAAJR6+8/wfQy2Q8eHxDT4u7VQcW4jmGtJC1CmjJMN yYCnJeYVv0NgDtZI4GGYaUKSHjof2Ozi17pbBc/om7C35grGnDRlDKgqh7aHjvWcxyCC 6zQ89R04fWh2/KFRlMCo9JNtd9Ev06R8aSxUVc7Gf/RQPbH49GsQO+4saygc0WgB7sPn P9m3HxB9iiV11TeIhTu6/1k4ceXu2BD8lnKYy90YHKfPIFcvRVAzOxmEjzZk5WopD8q7 kalBAZDUqdjin9o7rq3/BypnsLJnguY+koJa6IqFkoqq3wAdtxWPAiCNd6NoHlYC/Wvv t7ng==
In-reply-to: <20120703231122.GB19223@dastard>
References: <4FF2F41F.5000504@xxxxxxxxx> <20120703160949.GD855@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120703231122.GB19223@dastard>
Sender: for.poige@xxxxxxxxx
On 4 July 2012 07:11, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On the one hand I'd love to see these patches go into 3.4-stable as it's
>> going to be a long term release,
> Is it? So we will have long term support kernels for 3.0.x, 3.2.x
> and now 3.4.x? 3.0.x is the long term stable kernel I'm targetting
> for backports and there's no way I can really handle more than
> that...

   That's quite a pity! In production there's often even 2.6.32 since
it's chosen as RHEL6's kernel.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>