| To: | Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] block: add sysfs entry for discard_alignment |
| From: | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 03 Jul 2012 16:40:40 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120703143949.GE11272@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1341235225-27551-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> <1341235225-27551-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120703023442.GB3586@xxxxxxxxxx> <4FF2DCB1.2090704@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120703140048.GC11272@xxxxxxxxxx> <4FF2FFEE.4000401@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120703143949.GE11272@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0 |
Il 03/07/2012 16:39, Vivek Goyal ha scritto:
>> > +static inline int bdev_discard_alignment(struct block_device *bdev)
>> > +{
>> > + struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
>> > +
>> > + if (bdev != bdev->bd_contains)
>> > + return bdev->bd_part->discard_alignment;
>> > +
>> > + return q->limits.discard_alignment;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > static inline unsigned int queue_discard_zeroes_data(struct request_queue
>> > *q)
>> > {
>> > if (q->limits.max_discard_sectors && q->limits.discard_zeroes_data == 1)
>> > diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
>> > index b2bde5c..77d8869 100644
>> > --- a/block/blk-lib.c
>> > +++ b/block/blk-lib.c
>> > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev,
>> > sector_t sector,
>> > /* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same. */
>> > granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
>> > mask = granularity - 1;
>> > - alignment = (q->limits.discard_alignment >> 9) & mask;
>> > + alignment = bdev_discard_alignment(bdev) >> 9;
> Why are you removing AND with mask operation? I don't see any AND
> operation being done in bdev_discard_alignment().
For partitions it is done by queue_limits_discard_alignment. For disks,
it shouldn't be necessary at all but I can leave it.
paolo
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] block: add sysfs entry for discard_alignment, Vivek Goyal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] block: add sysfs entry for discard_alignment, Vivek Goyal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] block: add sysfs entry for discard_alignment, Vivek Goyal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] block: add sysfs entry for discard_alignment, Vivek Goyal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |