| To: | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] block: add sysfs entry for discard_alignment |
| From: | Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Jul 2012 10:00:48 -0400 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4FF2DCB1.2090704@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1341235225-27551-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> <1341235225-27551-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120703023442.GB3586@xxxxxxxxxx> <4FF2DCB1.2090704@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 01:51:13PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 03/07/2012 04:34, Vivek Goyal ha scritto: > >> > The next patches will actually use the alignment, expose it in sysfs > >> > for ease of debugging. > >> > > > Don't we already have discard_alignment exported as device attribute. > > > > /sys/block/<dev>/discard_alignment > > Ah, interesting, I missed it completely. I guess it's because queue/ > directories only exist for full disks, and the correct alignment varies > for each partition. So this patch is unnecessary. Partition discard_alignments are available in /sys/block/<disk>/<partition>/discard_alignment. That raises an interesting question for patch3. If the discard is happening to a partition, shouldn't you be looking at partition discard_alignment instead of always looking at queue discard_alignment? Thanks Vivek |
| Previous by Date: | Backporting the concurrent direct IO write fix to 3.4, Kerin Millar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [MMTests] IO metadata on XFS, Daniel Vetter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] block: add sysfs entry for discard_alignment, Paolo Bonzini |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] block: add sysfs entry for discard_alignment, Paolo Bonzini |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |