[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] types.h: implement intptr_t and uintptr_t

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] types.h: implement intptr_t and uintptr_t
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:02:32 +1000
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, joe@xxxxxxxxxxx, bpm@xxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20120620075216.GA24798@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1338487534-14575-1-git-send-email-jengelh@xxxxxxx> <20120620075216.GA24798@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:52:16AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I'd really like to get Jans type cleanups in XFS in for the next
> merge window.  Given the lack of feedback on lkml in favor or
> against (u)intptr_t I'm tempted to add them to xfs_linux.h for now,
> and then do another push to propagate them to kernel-wide types later.
> Is that fine with everybody?

I'd just push it into the XFS tree and into linux-next. It's a
relatively harmless set of changes, and if nobody cares enough about
it except us, just push it and see what happens when people start
noticing the conflicts it might cause....


Dave Chinner

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>