xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] types.h: implement intptr_t and uintptr_t

To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] types.h: implement intptr_t and uintptr_t
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 03:52:16 -0400
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, joe@xxxxxxxxxxx, bpm@xxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1338487534-14575-1-git-send-email-jengelh@xxxxxxx>
References: <1338487534-14575-1-git-send-email-jengelh@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
I'd really like to get Jans type cleanups in XFS in for the next
merge window.  Given the lack of feedback on lkml in favor or
against (u)intptr_t I'm tempted to add them to xfs_linux.h for now,
and then do another push to propagate them to kernel-wide types later.

Is that fine with everybody?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>