On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 04:29:31PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:04:00AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:56:19PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > they are rebased not to require the inode allocator patchset. I think
> > > > that Jan
> > > > is also going to repost his 'Fix overallocation in
> > > > xfs_buf_allocate_memory()'
> > > > based upon Dave's suggestions. It's best not to depend upon that
> > > > either. What
> > > > do you say, Dave?
> > >
> > > I reorder my local patch set and repost it after running it through
> > > some testing....
> > Sorry, I totally misunderstood the initial issue - I though Ben had my
> > series applied, and thus yours didn't apply.
> No, other way around ;)
> But I'm going to leave Jan kara's buffer cache over-allocation bug
> fix ahead my list, because that has to go into 3.5-rcX as it is a
> regression fix....
> FWIW, Ben, there's a few reviewed bug fixes on the list that are
> outstanding that need to go to Linus ASAP:
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-06/msg00056.html (regression)
> Can you take care of them please?
Add to that:
which also needs to go to Linus to fix an issue introduced in the